Difference between pages "Quantum Mechanics" and "Quantization"

From Absolute Theory
(Difference between pages)
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→‎Latest developments)
 
(Created page with "== History == Quantization, or as it is more commonly called these days, quantization is the basis of quantum theory. Using black body radiation, Max Planck discovered that e...")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
−
== History of quantum mechanics ==
+
== History ==
−
Max Planck taught the [[quantification]] of the world from black body radiation.  This means that physical quantities do not appear as a continuous spectrum, i.e. one in which all real numbers are represented, but as multiples of a basic unit, i.e. only as natural numbers, so to speak.  So far, so good, in classical quantum mechanics.  Then came further progress.  However, there are many misinterpretations of further progress here. Einstein summarized this in his quote: God does not roll the dice. For experimental physics in large particle accelerators with insanely high energies and tiny distances, probability theory may serve well, but is it the crux of the matter?
+
Quantization, or as it is more commonly called these days, quantization is the basis of quantum theory.  Using black body radiation, Max Planck discovered that energy does not occur as a discrete spectrum, i.e. all the possibilities of real numbers, but as a multiple of a unit.  The basic quantum of action is h, the value is: 6.62606957 * 10 ^ -34 J * sec.
  
−
== Uncertainty principle ==
+
== Quantization and the absolute theory ==
−
I particularly attack the misinterpretation of the uncertainty principle.  In essence, as presented by Heisenberg, it is good, as it says that delta (p) * delta (s)> = h. h is Plack's quantum of action.  The interpretation, however, that it follows that if I bombard a particle with a photon to determine the momentum, I directly change its position and then no longer know the position, is unacceptable.
+
The basic idea of ​​the absolute theory is that the quantization can be expressed in such a way that the real numbers R are no longer the correct set of numbers, but that when the quantum is defined as 1, the natural numbers represent the set of numbers for the physical quantities.  For example, from Einstein's knowledge that energy comes in quantum packets, one can conclude that E = n * elementary energy applies, i.e. that the energy occurs as a natural multiple of a basic energy.  Since E = m * c² now also applies, m * c² = n * elementary energy, i.e. m = n * [[elementary mass]], where the [[elementary mass]] is equal to the elementary energy through c².  In this conversion, however, the quantization is retained.  So if the energy is really quantized, so must the mass.
  
−
== Thought experiment ==
+
== Quantification of space and time ==
−
We envision a large, one-dimensional tunnel with only one photon, say, in the middle.  Now I want to bombard this photon with another to determine the momentum.  I choose photons because for me they correspond to energy quanta, and in my sense the smallest energy quantum there is.  Let's say the photon shoots into the tunnel, is reflected by the other photon, changes the position of the shot photon and comes back into my measuring device.  Now, abstractly, I know the momentum of the photon that I observed.  But I also know the exact location because I shot it with an elemental impulse and so it could only change its position by +1 in the tunnel.  So I only have to count up +1 on my measurement result from the location in order to make a sharp and exact statement here as well.
+
The question of whether spacetime is quantized or quantized is one of the great questions in contemporary physics.  If one assumes that the energy is quantized, which Einstein proved, and from which it follows, as just shown, that the mass is quantized, then, based on my hypothesis of the [[world formula]], space and time must be quantized.  Mass and space and time are equivalent, so that the number N is transferred again as in the example above.  m = [[elementary mass]] * n = t / constant, resulting in t = elementary time * n, because the elementary time is equal to the [[elemental mass]] divided by the constant.  The same applies to space, which is also equivalent to mass. I deliberately leave open the question of whether the three dimensions of a location arrow are also quantized for the elementary length and how it behaves with Einstein's space-time (s1, s2, s3, ict).  So far I can only speak abstractly for 1-dimensional lines.
−
 
 
−
== Latest developments ==
 
−
Meanwhile, even the prevailing opinion according to more recent developments assumes that the [[ Heisenberg's uncertainty principle]] does not apply and must be changed.  I would have to read up on the mathematics behind it for my readers, but the statement is clear that it no longer applies in its form.  I also assume that Planck's quantum of action h is too large and so only applies in the atomic range.  This results from the fact that the Planck mass as [[elemental mass]] would be too large, because then according to the [[Weltformel]] there would be too much mass at every location in space-time.  It is nice that contemporary physics finally recognizes this and also sees that quantum cryptography was first removed from underfoot.
 
−
 
 
−
And one more on top, which also confirms my thought experiment and Planck's doubts about the uncertainty relation: Forschungszentrum Jülich has published a paper in which they calculate the complete orbitals of electrons using photon emission.  And that without blurring, because they use mathematical methods to calculate the blurring out [https://www.pnas.org/content/early/2013/12/12/1315716110 Paper on calculating quantum mechanical blurring].
 

Revision as of 08:34, 19 September 2020

History

Quantization, or as it is more commonly called these days, quantization is the basis of quantum theory. Using black body radiation, Max Planck discovered that energy does not occur as a discrete spectrum, i.e. all the possibilities of real numbers, but as a multiple of a unit. The basic quantum of action is h, the value is: 6.62606957 * 10 ^ -34 J * sec.

Quantization and the absolute theory

The basic idea of ​​the absolute theory is that the quantization can be expressed in such a way that the real numbers R are no longer the correct set of numbers, but that when the quantum is defined as 1, the natural numbers represent the set of numbers for the physical quantities. For example, from Einstein's knowledge that energy comes in quantum packets, one can conclude that E = n * elementary energy applies, i.e. that the energy occurs as a natural multiple of a basic energy. Since E = m * c² now also applies, m * c² = n * elementary energy, i.e. m = n * elementary mass, where the elementary mass is equal to the elementary energy through c². In this conversion, however, the quantization is retained. So if the energy is really quantized, so must the mass.

Quantification of space and time

The question of whether spacetime is quantized or quantized is one of the great questions in contemporary physics. If one assumes that the energy is quantized, which Einstein proved, and from which it follows, as just shown, that the mass is quantized, then, based on my hypothesis of the world formula, space and time must be quantized. Mass and space and time are equivalent, so that the number N is transferred again as in the example above. m = elementary mass * n = t / constant, resulting in t = elementary time * n, because the elementary time is equal to the elemental mass divided by the constant. The same applies to space, which is also equivalent to mass. I deliberately leave open the question of whether the three dimensions of a location arrow are also quantized for the elementary length and how it behaves with Einstein's space-time (s1, s2, s3, ict). So far I can only speak abstractly for 1-dimensional lines.

Retrieved from "https://absolutetheory.com/index.php?title=Quantum_Mechanics&oldid=98"