Difference between pages "Main Page" and "The Ultimate Proof"

From Absolute Theory
(Difference between pages)
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(Created page with "Today I am writing about the ultimate math proof. There are many interesting questions at stake here. On the one hand, there is one or more epsilons to be defined for the co...")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
−
Welcome to my theory page.  Here everyone is encouraged to cheat so-called modern physics.  The articles that have received the most attention so far are [[Structure of the Universe]], [[Weltformel]], and [[Division by Zero]].  Newcomers should first read the [[Introduction for Newbies]], which provides certain articles on which other insights are based.  English visitors, if you want to make a [[https://paypal.me/tillmeyenburg Donation]] please, I would be more concentrated on science.
+
Today I am writing about the ultimate math proof.  There are many interesting questions at stake here.  On the one hand, there is one or more epsilons to be defined for the continuity of functions.  On the other hand, it is also about the question of whether the eternal add with one or whether the eternal divide by 2 continues ad infinitum.
  
−
Recently [[The Ultimate Proof]] of mathematics can also be read here.  It goes on and on in [[Physics]], even after Albert Einstein's [[Theory of Relativity]].  If you are looking for the special pages, you can find the [[Equivalence of space and time]], an important part of the [[Equivalences]], and [[Conservation laws]], including the [[Conservation of mass]].  The refutation of the [[conversion of mass into energy]], the so-called mass defect, is also important for this.  All articles on [[energy]] and [[mass]] are stored under the respective references.  The article on [[E = mc²]], the most important formula in the world so far, is also available here.  There is also a chapter on [[World Formula]], the triad of physics.  I also recommend the chapter on [[Quantum Mechanics]], a part of [[Quantum Theory]], with a thought experiment.  How to combine [[quantum theory]] and the continuum hypothesis, this essay shows briefly: [[space-time continuum]].  Mathematically, here is a little essay on [[Division by zero]] and on [[Complex numbers]].  Google also gave me the idea to say something about [[Planck space]], [[Planck time]], about [[mass and momentum of a photon]] and the [[elementary mass]].  It is important to have a basic understanding of [[quantization]].
+
Historically, Max Planck in particular has dealt with this question.  At that time he did not like his own discovery, Planck's quantum of action.  It contradicts the mathematical common sense that everything there is can be shared again.  The quantum is only valid in atomic theory, but its existence means that it is preserved as a difference even in infinity.
  
−
Furthermore there are chapters about the [[structure of matter]], about the [[metrics]], and in the section [[experiments]] I will collect various possibilities of proving my theory.  In addition, there is a short treatise on [[time flow]] and an essay on [[structure of the universe]].  Please also note my [http://www.till-meyenburg.de/download/Aufsatz1.pdf essay] together with Bernhard Hagen and an [http://www.till-meyenburg.de/download/Abstract_Till_Meyenburg.pdf Abstract]  , which I actually wrote for a symposium, but it was rejected.  All of this work solves a Millennium problem, [[Yang-Mill's theory]], which is based on the fact that quantum particles have a mass and which has been confirmed by many experiments. I am also currently writing a brief essay on [[String Theory]]. In addition, I also refer to current topics: [[Hawking radiation]], [[radioactive radiation]], [[EPR theorem]], [[faster than light]] of [[neutrinos]] and the [[Higgs]] boson  .  The absolute theory would also have an answer for the different directions of the [[Coriolis force]] on the hemispheres.
+
Now for the proof:
 +
We take the unlimited amount of everything.  This set contains the set of all relations as a subset.  This set in turn contains the relation of the limitedness of the set of everything.  This is a clear contradiction, from which it follows that every non-self-contradicting, i.e. well-defined, set is restricted.
  
−
My basic idea in a nutshell is: The theoretical physics up to now has assumed that the [[division by zero]] is not defined.  Accordingly, it continues to assume that photons have no or at least no defined [[mass]].  From this she concludes that there is no [[mass conservation law]].  Here comes the idea that the whole thing should be approached the other way round, according to Albert Einstein's motto, no problem would be solved with the way of thinking with which it was created.  The absolute theory thus takes the [[mass conservation law]] as given.  From this it follows [[mass and momentum of a photon]].  From this one can in turn derive the necessity of the definition of the [[division by zero]].  Have fun with my crazy but correct ideas.  Finally, note my [[dedication]].  If you want to donate, my PayPal link is https://paypal.me/tillmeyenburg
+
Furthermore, if we can usefully apply the completeness axiom to a set, so that there are meaningful greater or equal relations, there is an upper and a lower bound.  So this proof also serves as proof of God as the uppermost limit, regardless of what properties he has.  The epsilon is then e.g.  3 - 2,99999999 .... And there is only one.  Accordingly, there is a highest number.  Inevitably, this upper number must result in relation to itself and thus be the ones element with regard to multiplication.  Contrary to my habit, I quote Kurt Cobain here: all in all is all we are.  So everything divided by everything results in everything.
−
 
 
−
== Book recommendations ==
 
−
 
 
−
Absolutely recommendable book links, ordered and I get a little commission.  All of them not difficult to read, and none of the descriptions are excessive.
 

Latest revision as of 15:37, 18 September 2020

Today I am writing about the ultimate math proof. There are many interesting questions at stake here. On the one hand, there is one or more epsilons to be defined for the continuity of functions. On the other hand, it is also about the question of whether the eternal add with one or whether the eternal divide by 2 continues ad infinitum.

Historically, Max Planck in particular has dealt with this question. At that time he did not like his own discovery, Planck's quantum of action. It contradicts the mathematical common sense that everything there is can be shared again. The quantum is only valid in atomic theory, but its existence means that it is preserved as a difference even in infinity.

Now for the proof: We take the unlimited amount of everything. This set contains the set of all relations as a subset. This set in turn contains the relation of the limitedness of the set of everything. This is a clear contradiction, from which it follows that every non-self-contradicting, i.e. well-defined, set is restricted.

Furthermore, if we can usefully apply the completeness axiom to a set, so that there are meaningful greater or equal relations, there is an upper and a lower bound. So this proof also serves as proof of God as the uppermost limit, regardless of what properties he has. The epsilon is then e.g. 3 - 2,99999999 .... And there is only one. Accordingly, there is a highest number. Inevitably, this upper number must result in relation to itself and thus be the ones element with regard to multiplication. Contrary to my habit, I quote Kurt Cobain here: all in all is all we are. So everything divided by everything results in everything.

Retrieved from "https://absolutetheory.com/index.php?title=Main_Page&oldid=14"