Division by zero

From Absolute Theory
Revision as of 13:38, 27 March 2019 by Till (talk | contribs) (Division by zero and complex numbers)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search


Since at the latest Newton mankind is kean on the divison by zero. Even in physics you reach borders where the answer would be very helpful. I could not solve the problem completely. Even a virus destroyed my proof on my computer in 1999. Even he destroyed a beginning essay on the constitution of space, too.

Shortly: the proof

I got to do the proof even once more. Hopefully in my basement I have a print of the proof, but here I want to commit the basic truths of the proof. Instead of the old real numbers r (old), we assume the new real numbers r (new). As with the complexe numbers, there are two dimensions added. So we have:

r(new) = vector(r(old) * 0, r(old) * 1, r(old) * infinity) Then you go through the axioms of realsnaumbers and examine whether they are working. An old friend (Schaper) told off a bloated set, but the proof passes and the uniqueness of the numbers is given. So I would not talk about a bloated set, but of a contribution to research epsilon, the set used for deduction. More simple you can use the numbers as 0(1), that would be 1 * 0.

So 0 / 0 = 1 (0 is no longer a number, but a set of numbers)

0(1) / 0(1) = (1 / 1) * (0 / 0) = 1 * 1 = 1

0(r) / 0(r) = 1

For example:

0(3) / 0(1) = 3

Therefore the old falsification of division by zero is no longer true, as you cannot say: 0 * r = 0, so there is no uniqueness.


So you do not need complicated limit calculations. (In school I hated that, but I wasn't heard).

There for example the derivation of y = 3x would be:

f´ = (3 * 0) / (1 * 0) = 0(3) / 0(1) = 3


Maybe one day I will solve this problem completely, as it is great, for example:

0(0) / 0(0) = (0 / 0) * (0 / 0) = 1.

So you see that you have to define the real numbers as vector(product(r(old)) * 0, product(r(old)) * 1, product(r(old)) * infinty). The proof would pass through either.

Division by zero and complex numbers

So you know law of derivation. It is delta(y) / delta(x). Normally you take epsilon for derivation. f(x + epsilon) - f(x) / epsilon And epsilon is a number not part of real numbers. It is lower than any real number > 0 but it is for itself > 0 I say the normal way is bullshit. If you substitute epsilon by i you can derive as good So if we take f(x) = 4x^2. so you have ( 4(x + i)^2 – 4x^2) / i

1 / i = -i

So you have (8xi - 1) * i. See both 4x^2 vanish Sorry (8xi - 1) * - i So you get 8x + i. And real part is derivation. Whole thing is better derivation. And now you see you can substitute epsilon or even zero by i.