Difference between pages "Structure of matter" and "Metrics"

From Absolute Theory
(Difference between pages)
Jump to navigationJump to search
(The structure)
 
(Further development)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
== Quarks & Co. ==
+
== Einstein metric ==
Previous physics has always assumed that matter is composed of ever smaller masses.  At the beginning, the molecules were discovered, then the atoms, until one noticed with protons, neutrons and electrons that the atoms are not indivisible either, as the name actually suggests (atom comes from ancient Greek and means indivisible unit)However, quantum theory tells us that the basis of basic physical quantities such as mass are natural numbers and not, as one would mathematically assume, the real and / or complex onesAccordingly, the ever further subdivision and the ever ongoing discovery of smaller particles has set a limit by quantum theory, the [[elemental mass]]A photon or a quantum have the [[elementary mass]], it doesn't get any smaller in our universe.  All particles are made up of quanta, especially the quarks as far as they are not quanta themselves.
+
Albert Einstein introduced the four-dimensional space-time continuum as a metricAccording to this, each event is given a four-dimensional space-time vectorThis is (s1, s2, s3, t * c)Here you can already see the [[equivalence of space and time]], since the fourth coordinate of this vector is nothing other than time broken down into space.
  
== Division by Zero ==
+
== Further development ==
The [[Division by Zero]] that I have defined affects the structure of matterFrom this one could deduce the [[mass and momentum of a photon]].  The new numbers, which are around zero in the epsilon environment, also suggest that the quanta are also built up from smaller ones, quasi-spiritually (or virtually as particle physics calls it).  These particles have a mass greater than 0 but less than any real number before the redefinitionA quantum would then be made up of an infinite number of virtual particles.
+
According to the [[Weltformel]], this can also be done for the massesYou simply break the mass down to space and thus get the fifth dimension of the space-time-mass continuum.  The vector is then (s1, s2, s3, t * c, m * (Planck elementary length / elementary mass)).  However, in this expression, and also with Einstein, one has to see time and mass combined.  Time is actually three-dimensional, just as one has to replace the expression of the mass with a three-dimensional oneBut the 5-dimensional space-time-mass continuum should already be a more suitable metric than Einstein's four-dimensional space-time continuum.
  
== The electron and the proton ==
+
== Metric of equilateral triangles ==
The electron has mass, a mass greater than the elementary massAccordingly, it consists of several quanta or photons (I use these terms synonymously, although the photon is ultimately only a quantum of light).  Ultimately, the [[proton]] is also only made up of quanta.
+
If you think about the metrics of space, time and mass, you should draw on a finding from Albert Einstein: The relativity speed of light is always the same as c, so space and time bend in such a way that it is always preservedThis shows that the metric of space must consist of equilateral triangles at the micro level.  This is the only way to ensure that the quanta and especially the light quanta, the photons, move relative to each other at the speed of light.
  
== The structure ==
+
== Metric of Rotation and Lisa Randall's Hidden Universes ==
Ultimately, everything consists of quanta if you get to the bottom of itWe humans also consist of quanta, the deeper you goFirst come the molecules, then come the atoms, then come protons, neutrons and electrons and then quantaFrom this also follows the [[equivalence of space and time]].  Since the quanta move at the speed of light in any case, this speed must be maintained when merging.  Space and time are preserved so that the quotient always remains constant in the structure of matter, so the speed always remains constant c.
+
The current discussion in physics, especially the experiments at CERN, aim to confirm a further development of string theory by Lisa Randall and colleaguesShe tries to explain phenomena at the micro level through hidden dimensions or microscopic universesMaybe my approach is a little differentI also open up a new dimension at one point in order to secure the [[equivalence of space and time]].  So it is that if a particle only rotates and thus cannot leave its place in terms of locomotion, a dimension has to be opened in terms of rotation so that it can leave its place, although according to previous view it remains in the same place.  The space would then no longer be 3-dimensional, but at least four-dimensional, with three dimensions of movement and at least one of rotation.
 
 
== Forces of attraction and particles ==
 
In collaboration with a friend, who also appeared frequently as a commentator, I developed a very simple explanation for the cohesion of matter on Facebook.  He got me on it by posting a paper on quantum chromodynamics.  Ultimately, one can say that molecules are held together by the valence electrons.  Atoms, in turn, are held together by gluons, which for a long time are assumed to be nothing other than photons.  This can now be confirmed, as an electron can be split off from the atom by photon bombardment.  It is probably even possible to split off all electrons through intense bombardment, so that atomic nuclei can be produced very easily.  The atom itself consists of neutrons and protons.  Neutrons can be split by neutrino bombardment, so that the neutrino is the element that holds the neutron together.  The proton in turn consists of quarks.  Now, as the paper emerged, one can release neutrinos here by bombarding them with gluons.  So here the cohesive element is again a gluon.  This gluon here is smaller than photons and if it is not a very small neutrino itself, smaller than a neutrino.
 
 
 
Ultimately, the electron is then also a gluon, for molecules.  And the photon is indeed a gluon for the atom.  That obeys the principle of the simplest explanation.
 

Latest revision as of 10:57, 19 September 2020

Einstein metric

Albert Einstein introduced the four-dimensional space-time continuum as a metric. According to this, each event is given a four-dimensional space-time vector. This is (s1, s2, s3, t * c). Here you can already see the equivalence of space and time, since the fourth coordinate of this vector is nothing other than time broken down into space.

Further development

According to the Weltformel, this can also be done for the masses. You simply break the mass down to space and thus get the fifth dimension of the space-time-mass continuum. The vector is then (s1, s2, s3, t * c, m * (Planck elementary length / elementary mass)). However, in this expression, and also with Einstein, one has to see time and mass combined. Time is actually three-dimensional, just as one has to replace the expression of the mass with a three-dimensional one. But the 5-dimensional space-time-mass continuum should already be a more suitable metric than Einstein's four-dimensional space-time continuum.

Metric of equilateral triangles

If you think about the metrics of space, time and mass, you should draw on a finding from Albert Einstein: The relativity speed of light is always the same as c, so space and time bend in such a way that it is always preserved. This shows that the metric of space must consist of equilateral triangles at the micro level. This is the only way to ensure that the quanta and especially the light quanta, the photons, move relative to each other at the speed of light.

Metric of Rotation and Lisa Randall's Hidden Universes

The current discussion in physics, especially the experiments at CERN, aim to confirm a further development of string theory by Lisa Randall and colleagues. She tries to explain phenomena at the micro level through hidden dimensions or microscopic universes. Maybe my approach is a little different. I also open up a new dimension at one point in order to secure the equivalence of space and time. So it is that if a particle only rotates and thus cannot leave its place in terms of locomotion, a dimension has to be opened in terms of rotation so that it can leave its place, although according to previous view it remains in the same place. The space would then no longer be 3-dimensional, but at least four-dimensional, with three dimensions of movement and at least one of rotation.