Search results

...he law of conservation of momentum. A car has a speed of 100 km / h and a mass of one ton. If it now encounters resistance and is braked abruptly, the im ...here must be positive and negative masses, otherwise the [[Conservation of mass]] postulated by me would be wrong.

...lot from it. The absolute theory, of course, also believes in the law of conservation of energy, even if it sees that the concept of total energy is controversia == Einstein and the law of conservation of energy ==

...it means that the speed is also maintained beyond the [[speed conservation law]] described by me. So you can see that if m = const. applies and if p = m ...nt, then only E (0) can be retained. If, however, E (0) remains, the rest mass according to m (0) = E (0) / c² is also a conserved quantity.

...ording to Einstein, that photons have a rest mass of 0, one assumes that [[mass]] is lost during this process. ..., but also have the mass 0. Accordingly, it is concluded that there is no conservation of the masses.

...ly wrong for me to post a post in this wiki with the heading Conversion of mass into energy, because it does not exist. Rather, this area is about the ref ...nterpreted in such a way that if I have a mass 1 and a reaction, then this mass 1 is converted into an energy 1. Mathematically completely wrong basic too

...ainst a law of conservation of matter in contrast to the [[Conservation of mass]]. Matter can be dissolved into an infinite number of virtual particles an ...ound zero. This follows from the [[anti-proportionality of locomotion and mass]]. Both also have an energy in the epsilon range around zero, only when an

...onnects the three basic quantities of the mks system [[space]], time and [[mass]]. So now it's easy: As a counterexample for the law of space conservation, it used to be pointed out in school that when two or more atoms combine to

...se results from the knowledge gained from this Wiki. [[Weltformel]] and [[Conservation laws]] have a direct effect on the picture of the structure of our universe ...e, time and mass are equivalent terms. So at point in time 1, space 1 and mass 1 must also have applied after nothing.

...r shrink in the same proportion. You have an energy of 3. Then you have a mass of 3. The units of measurement are deliberately left out. c is equal to 1. ...n the sense of my theory. I mean ultimately the light with the [elemental mass]]. Of course, Einstein's cosmological principle then becomes shaky in my t

...10 ^ -70 kg. There is still a lot of space for particles that have a real mass and yet move faster than light. ...there are particles with energies in the epsilon range of zero and with a mass of the same shape, which propagate with faster light speed. The epsilon ra